Becoming a victim of “robotizing” is truly menacing for our profession. Turning into a sort of teaching android is something that should be avoided at all costs. But before taking distance from this danger, we need to check if we have not already become a prey of it, or if we are not in the process of becoming one.
Choose an answer to the questions.
Here are some ideas:
1.Today you have a class and you haven´t prepared anything special. You have had a very busy week or you have had some problems at home or maybe you haven´t felt very good recently because of an illness or something similar. So you take the book, read the title of the unit and prepare yourself to decide how you are going to have your students do the exercises. Whatever the circumstances are, you check the teacher’s guide and the students’ book and you feel that just doing the exercises as the book indicates will be just fine. YES or NO?
2.You feel that you must begin every lesson with a warmer, so you always use the same game or the same question. The idea is to help students connect with the lesson, so it doesn’t matter too much the way of doing it. Besides, students love that. Do you always begin / do / present an activity in pretty much the same manner? YES OR NO?
3.You have had a great lesson with your teenager students. In fact, they loved it. You feel satisfied. You have been assigned to give the same lesson, but with a group of adults in the evening class. Since you had such a success with your teenage class, you don’t hesitate to use the very same strategy with this evening group. It has to be a sensation too. Do you use the very same lesson plan with all your students without considering the big or small differences that might exist? YES OR NO?
4.You propose, for instance, that learners work in pairs and that they do so with the person next to them. To introduce some variation, you have them move around and find another partner to work with. This definitely works because students have the chance to use the language being learned with different people. Do you always organize the experience of interacting in the same way? YES OR NO?
If you have 4 yeses, you regrettably are on a first name basis with C3PO and R2D2.
If you have 3 yeses, you unfortunately have already adopted the robot style.
If you have 2 yeses, you pitifully are on the way of embracing the robot style.
If you have 1 “yes,” you, possibly inadvertently, are on the verge of espousing the robot style.
If you need more ideas and reasons to avoid becoming a victim of “robotizing” check the following link.
Can you give us more examples that show evidence of “robotizing”?
Can you mention how to avoid any of the symptoms mentioned above?
M.A. in Cognition, Learning and Development from PUCP, B.A. in Education with a major in English Teaching. Ms. Vila is currently Teacher trainer, Pedagogic Consultant and Member of the Research Team at Centro de Idiomas de la Universidad del Pacífico. She is Academic Director of International Contacts (test training & foreign applications advisory) and relationship manager for American universities´ MBA admissions officers with International Contacts. She is official Examiner for several University of Cambridge tests, freelance consultant with Universidad ESAN, experienced speaker on diverse English teaching issues for prestigious institutions, and senior international examinations trainer (GMAT, GRE, TOEFL, IELTS).
On our last article we reflected on the importance of being identified
with the goals of the institution you work for. Now we offer a questionnaire so
you can measure your degree of
1. Do you see yourself working for the same school or institute…
a)for many years?
b)for four or five years?
c)Until the end of this year?
d)I may leave any time.
2. Is it easy for me to build strong relationships with my co-workers?
b)More or less.
c)Not too easy.
d)It is hard for me.
3. Do you expect to find opportunities for progress in your present job?
a)Very much so.
4. Do you picture yourself as part of a team
with authorities and other teachers?
I feel I’m part of a well-oiled machine.
We generally work in accordance.
We agree on certain basic points.
d)I do the best I can and don’t worry about the
5. Do you set
goals for yourself…
a)both for major problems and for minor
b)only for major projects.
c)when I feel there’s need for a change.
d)no. I just make sure to follow the program
for each course.
6. Do you show
concern for the students’ individual goals?
I try to find out and consider the reasons why they want to learn.
I teach trying to cater to the needs of the majority of students.
c) I understand there are different needs for
I think their reasons are irrelevant for me. I’m only concerned withteaching well.
7. Do you usually change jobs?
Only if a major chance comes up.
Not very often but I keep an eye open for opportunities
Each year I try to find something better.
I’m always ready to switch where I can find better conditions.
When your boss asks you to do something that is not part of your regular
a) You cheerfully accept.
b) You sometimes accept with reserves
c) Sometimes you accept.
d) You never accept.
In your work…
a) you strive for excellence
out of your own impulse.
b) you always try to give a
good impression to your bosses.
c) you comply just to stay out
d) you do as little as possible
if you can get away with it.
When you get ready to begin your class…
a) you leave your personal
problems and life outside the classroom.
b) you don’t let your state of
mind affect your performance.
your personal problems or state of mind doesn’t affect too much the way you
treat your students.
your optimum performance is only when you’re in a good mood.
11. The paperwork and other things the institution
requires from you…
It is always handed on time by you.
You generally hand them in on time.
Once in a while I’m a little late.
I’m not very timely with those things.
12. Are you familiar with your institution’s mission
I know them well and I can tell what they are.
I’m familiar with them in general terms.
I have some idea of what they are.
I have no idea.
13. Do you identify with your institution’s mission
Yes, one hundred percent.
I do in general terms
I coincide with them partially.
THERE IS ALWAYS ANOTHER SIDE TO CONSIDER
14. When you think about your future you feel…
your institution offers you a career line?
your employer cares for you as a person?
like a replaceable convenience for your employer?
like a pawn on your employers’ chessboard?
Do you think your efforts and merits…
a) are being fairly appraised
and recognized by the institution you work for?
b) are given some recognition by your employer?
c) are minimized and overlooked by your organization?
d) go usually unfairly unrecognized?
Reflecton your answers to the above questions. If you have answered mostly with
aYou and your institution have convergent goals. This is a win-win situation
b You can say that you run in parallel with the institution where you work in relation with objectives and identification.
cYou don´t pursue the same goals as you employer. This may be an amber signal. Proceed with a lot of caution.
dIt is absolutely unlikely that you and your employer can have a very good relationship for a long time.
BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Graduated in Journalism at the PUCP, Peru, Enrique Rojas R. holds a MA in Journalism and MA in Inter American History from Southern Illinois University, USA; an MA in Literature from University of the Americas, Puebla, Mexico, all the coursework for a MA in TEFL at Universidad de Piura, Peru and BA in Education from Universidad Federico Villarreal. He has also obtained Certificates of Proficiency in English both from Cambridge University and the University of Michigan and the Diploma for EFL Teachers from Universidad del Pacifico. He is an Oral Examiner for the Cambridge University exams and has been awarded the title Expert in E-Learning from Asociacion Educativa del Mediterraneo and Universidad Marcelino Champagnat. He has worked as a professor in universities in Peru, Mexico and the United States; as a newscaster and a producer in radio and television stations in the United States and Mexico, and as a writer and editor in daily newspapers of the same countries. He has been in the staff of CIDUP for 19 years teaching English and Spanish specializing in International Exams, English for Business, ESP and Teacher Training. He has been a speaker in every Congress of English for Special Purposes organized by Centro de Idiomas de la U.P. He is also a member of its Research Area.